An Organizational Magnifying Glass

Wayne W. Eckerson, the director of research at the Data Warehouse Institute and author of Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Your Business (Wiley, 2006), tells the story of seeing his 11 year old son, Harry, and his friend, Jake, kneeling side by side in his driveway. As he walked over to inspect, he saw a puff of smoke come up between them. They each had a magnifying glass and were using it to set fire to dried grass and a few unfortunate ants who had wandered into their makeshift science experiment. In this boyhood rite of passage, Harry and Jake learned an important lesson that escapes the attention of many court managers: the power of focus.

Light normally radiates and diffuses all over the place, bouncing off objects on the earth surface. The boys discovered that if they focused the sun’s rays into a single point, they could generate enough energy to burn just about anything and keep themselves entertained for hours.

By the time they grow up, and maybe run a court, they probably will have forgotten the lesson. They may be steeped in a court culture that is without focus, dissipating energies far and wide. Most courts have multiple departments, units and divisions – each with their own processes, practices, and systems. They spin off in multiple directions without bringing resources and energies to a clear focus. Much of what they do conflicts and is not aligned with mission and strategic goals.

They need an “organizational magnifying glass,” suggests Eckerson, something that focuses the work of everyone in the court and ensures that everyone is going in the right direction. The preoccupations of effective leaders are clarity and focus, but hey need more than charisma and a strong message. They need a performance measurement system that focuses and magnifies what is most important. They need ready access to clear and actionable measures that allow them to explore the court’s performance from multiple perspectives and to steer the court in the right direction.

For the latest posts and archives of Made2Measure click here.

Copyright CourtMetrics 2006. All rights reserved.

Comments

  1. ackerleyacton84:17 AM

    Thanks for sharing this blog, Beauty Floor and Desk Magnifying Lamps, LED Magnifying Lamps, Magnifier Lights plus spare parts and accessories. Order an online magnifying lamp with delivery Australia wide.
    magnifying glass with light Australia

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nina Macintyre12:25 AM

    Get free shipping on qualified Lighted Magnifiers Desk Lamps products or Buy Online Pick Up in Store today in the Capital Salon Supplies.
    magnifying glass with light

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Reasons for Performance Measurement

There is a growing demand of “show me the data” from citizens and taxpayers, legislators, executive agencies, oversight boards and communities – all of whom exchange money and other support (e.g., trust and confidence) for services -- that courts can ill afford to ignore. Courts need to measure their performance to meet the demand for public accountability. But the benefits of court performance extend beyond accountability including improved prediction, better understanding and control, influence, a sharpened focus on what is important, and discovery of better practices. Objective performance data is central to good management practices like strategic planning, performance-based budgeting, Balanced Scorecards, Total Quality Management (TQM), and Six Sigma. Performance measures allow court leaders and managers, policymakers, legislators and the public to evaluate court programs’ inputs (the resources allocated), outputs (direct results of program or service activities) and outcomes (bro
Read more

The “What Ifs” Along the Road in the Quest of a Justice Index

What if we could draw an indicator of the “health” of the justice systems throughout the United States – a Justice Index - from readily available public data that is impartial, reliable, objective and comparable, let’s say the amount of time that criminal defendants spend in custody without a trial, or even without any access to legal or justice services? Or the bail amounts imposed on misdemeanor defendants?   This kind of a measure would not be perfect – no measure is – but it would be something, better than nothing. It would address questions of fairness and efficient use of public resources. That is, a criminal defendant languishing in jail awaiting trial suffers, at the least, a delay in justice. He or she is also occupying a jail bed and spending taxpayers’ money. What if we then join this measure with another meaningful indicator of the health of our justice systems in counties and states, let’s say the degree to which jurisdictions prosecute domestic violence cases.
Read more

Q & A: Outcome vs. Measure vs. Target vs. Standard

Q: Those of who write and speak about court performance measurement rely on their share of jargon -- and it's often confusing. What are the differences among the terms “outcome,” “measure,” “target” and “standard”? A: Socrates said that the beginning of wisdom is definition. We’ll see. Outcomes are the benefits or changes for the intended beneficiaries of a court’s programs and services. Outcomes may relate to knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, behavior, condition or status of the program participants or recipients of services. Examples include litigants' satisfaction with a court's courtesy and responsiveness, success of probation, time to case disposition, clarity of orders, integrity of case files, percent of mediation agreements, enforcement of orders, and perceived fairness of proceedings, as well as percent of expected expenditures and percent of revenues received. Outcomes should not be confused with the activities of those who run the court. (See the October 1
Read more